The focus is on matters of continuity and change. In order to test this proposition, this article will look at the reception of a chronicle, especially from c.1450 to c.1520, but giving attention to the rest of the sixteenth century as well. Historians should rather be looking for developments in terms of an evolution than in terms of revolution. Eisenstein’s vision has been under attack for many years. Thinking of history in terms of revolutions often leads to oversimplification. That does not deny changes, but these changes cannot be properly analysed if we think in terms of a rupture between two different worlds. Just as the history of carriages should be integrated in the history of cars and we cannot understand the history of steam ships without studying sailing ships, we should see the history of manuscripts and of printed books as a continuum. Denying the differences between handwritten and printed books might be easily ridiculed, but new insights can be gained by emphasising continuity, rather than rupture. The authors allow us to venture along a variety of paths, ranging from the well-established kingdoms of Africa and Asia to the apparently egalitarian societies. There is much to be gained by not separating manuscripts and printed books, especially when focussing on the years from 1450 to 1550. All too often book history of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries starts with the premise that there was a profound change, a revolution introduced by the printing press. This article presents a case study in order to underline the statement that books are books, whether they are written by hand or printed by movable type. Use the Art Museum combined with all of its combos to create a 'downtown' rich man zone. Art Museum Art Museums combo with a lot of cheap structures. The +30 product price makes them sandwich well with Jewelers, Car Dealers, and the Pleasure Combo. The watershed between medievalists studying manuscripts on the basis of copies and early modernists studying printed books on the basis of editions means that it is difficult to discern the continuities and discontinuities. I have about 4 of these in my most successful towns so far. Secondly, we are all too used to studying handwritten books as individual books and printed books, as a rule, not as books but as editions. First of all, manuscripts often tend not to be seen as grown up books. Argos, when there are hundreds of towns in Greece and Italy where the drink is good, the inns. But in practice this statement is less self-evident than it should be. Book history is – obviously – about books.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |